The Margin Confidence Paradox: when confidence becomes a risk

October 15, 2026
•

The Margin Confidence Paradox: when confidence becomes a risk

Gorilla CEO Ruben Van den Bossche explores the Margin Confidence Paradox in energy retail. Discover why confidence in reporting accuracy can mask poor visibility, delayed decisions, and revenue at risk.
October 15, 2026
•

The Margin Confidence Paradox: when confidence becomes a risk

October 15, 2026
•

Confidence can often be a positive thing but, in energy retail, it can also hide a problem. Our Energy Margin Intelligence Index surveyed 600 senior energy leaders across six European markets and uncovered a striking contradiction: more than 90 per cent of respondents said they are confident in the accuracy of their organisation’s margin reporting, yet most can reconcile reported sales with actual financial margin only ‘usually, with some gaps or delays’, while 74 per cent say siloed teams are preventing effective margin optimisation. This suggests that, ultimately, leaders are confident about the wrong thing: accuracy rather than timelines and actionability.

We call this the Margin Confidence Paradox. It comes at a difficult moment for energy retailers. Volatile wholesale markets, demand for more sophisticated products and tariffs, changing regulations and growing pressure to use AI are all increasing the speed and complexity of commercial decision-making. In that environment, confidence only holds up if the visibility behind it reaches the level where decisions are made; by contract, customer and product, as conditions change. 

The Index suggests there is still a significant gap between the two. Most respondents estimate that between six and ten per cent of annual revenue is at risk from poor margin visibility and slow decision-making. Meanwhile, disconnected teams and systems can leave pricing, trading, risk, forecasting and finance working from different versions of commercial reality. The danger isn’t necessarily a lack of data, it’s believing that having the data means having control.

The distinction becomes critical when markets move quickly. A margin report can be accurate and still arrive too late to influence a pricing, hedging or portfolio decision. After all, even the most accurate reporting can only account for the margin captured, not the opportunities missed. In that situation, confidence is based on a past snapshot rather than a real-time view of margin.

Closing the gap means connecting commercial and operational data so teams can see where margin is being made, where it is leaking and what action to take while there is still time to change the outcome. 

The real risk isn’t knowing that you have a visibility problem, it’s being confident that you don’t.

Share this post